|
Newsgroups: news.announce.newgroups,news.groups,alt.writing,misc.writing,rec.arts.sf.composition
From: Dave Cornejo [dave@dogwood.com]
Subject: RESULT: misc.writing.moderated moderated passes 155:45
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 19:40:43 GMT
Organization: Usenet Volunteer Votetakers
Approved: newgroups-request@isc.org
Archive-Name: misc.writing.moderated
Supersedes: <958074594.1543@isc.org>
RESULT
moderated group misc.writing.moderated passes 155:45
There were 155 YES votes and 45 NO votes, for a total of 200 valid
votes. There were 11 abstentions.
For a group to pass, YES votes must be at least 2/3 of all valid
(YES and NO) votes. There must also be at least 100 more YES votes
than NO votes.
A five day discussion period follows this announcement. If no
serious allegations of voting irregularities are raised, the
moderator of news.announce.newgroups will create the group shortly
thereafter.
Newsgroups line:
misc.writing.moderated Art, craft, business and creative process of writing. (Moderated)
Voting closed at 23:59:59 UTC, 22 May 2000.
This vote was conducted by a neutral third party. Questions
about the proposed group should be directed to the proponent.
Proponent: Paul Harwood
Proponent: Anna Banana
Proponent: Moira D.
Proponent: Bob Pastorio
Proponent: Sal Towse
Mentor: piranha
Votetaker: Dave Cornejo
RATIONALE: misc.writing.moderated
There are currently six widely-propagated newsgroups chartered for
discussions of writing: alt.writing, misc.writing, misc.writing.screenplays,
rec.arts.poems, rec.arts.prose, and rec.arts.sf.composition. Of these,
rec.arts.poems and rec.arts.prose are intended as critique groups, while
misc.writing.screenplays and rec.arts.sf.compostion are genre-specific, and
both misc.writing and alt.writing have evolved to encompass much off-charter
traffic. This off-charter traffic is an accepted and integral part of the
culture, but can make it difficult to focus on the writing-related
discussions. In addition, misc.writing has become a heavily-used group,
getting upwards of 350 posts per day.
In order to provide a writing forum that is not particular to any specific
genre, but which provides focussed discussion on the art, craft, business
and creative process of writing in a positive atmosphere, we propose to
create misc.writing.moderated.
Rough statistical analyses have shown that 12% to 25% of misc.writing's
traffic could be considered on-charter in misc.writing.moderated. Similar
rough analysis of the traffic in alt.writing, which has recently averaged
about 90 posts per day, showed that 63% of the traffic there could be
considered on-charter in misc.writing.moderated.
CHARTER: misc.writing.moderated
Misc.writing.moderated is a forum for discussion of the process and
profession of writing. It is a newsgroup where all participants are treated
as peers. The focus in misc.writing.moderated is on developing as writers,
increasing writing income and/or discussing the process and business of
writing.
Misc.writing.moderated is inclusive in that discussion of all forms of
writing is considered appropriate, but it is exclusive in that all
discussion must be aimed toward the development of participants as writers,
or toward providing cooperative support for their writing and their writing
ambitions. Questions of grammar and style are appropriate, but should be
sought in the FAQ. Of greater interest are topics such as plotting
techniques, character or thematic development, research methods, industry
trends and news, market information, finding and dealing with an agent,
techniques for best marketing one's work, software tools, manuscript
formatting, how to avoid repetitive stress injury, and other such concerns
with which writers struggle.
Misc.writing.moderated accepts reasonable and timely announcements of
seminars, conferences, new markets, and other commercial ventures that may
be of interest to the practicing writer, though repetitive commercial
announcements are disallowed. For the purposes of this charter,
"repetitive" is defined as more than
once per month.
While questions about writing problems are appropriate in
misc.writing.moderated, the posting of long excerpts from written works, or
of shorter works in their entirety, is expressly forbidden. Participants
are free to quote from their work as part of a larger discussion within a
post. This includes, but is not limited to, illustrations of writing
technique, questions of why certain passages do or do not work, and short
segments designed to spark a discussion about the art or craft of writing.
Those looking for critiques are welcome to post URLs where their work can be
found, or to post short, non-repetitive announcements that work is available
for critique.
Articles that exceed the bounds of common courtesy -- e.g., personal attacks
against other posters -- are never acceptable, no matter what the context of
the article and no matter how small a part of the article the attack may be.
Also unacceptable are articles that consist solely of "yahoos", birthday
greetings, and so on.
Signature files are subject to reasonable length restrictions, and may not
contain personal attacks against other posters. A signature file may
contain non-writing-related URLs or personal advertisements.
Binaries with the exception of small cryptographic authentication such as
PGP signatures in non-binary messages are not acceptable.
This charter, or a URL pointing to it, is posted once a week to
misc.writing.moderated.
Misc.writing.moderated accepts no crossposts, except: RFDs, CFVs, and
related administrative postings (as approved by the moderators of
news.announce.newgroups) with followups set to news.groups and/or
misc.writing.moderated, articles in response to such postings crossposted
only between news.groups and misc.writing.moderated, and FAQs and similar
informational postings (as approved by the moderators of news.answers).
Moderation
Misc.writing.moderated is moderated, which means that all articles to the
group pass through a review process before being posted. The purpose of
moderation is to maintain focussed discussion in an atmosphere of mutual
respect. To this end, the Moderators will strive to maintain both focus and
cordiality.
Moderation will be by a Moderation Board, consisting of a Head Moderator and
several Associate Moderators. The number of Associate Moderators is set by
the Board, but the Board will make a good-faith effort to maintain a
membership of at least three Associate Moderators. Only members of the
Moderation Board have the power to approve posts.
As technical expertise is required for continued functioning of the
moderation software, misc.writing.moderated calls upon the skills of a
Technical Administrator. The Technical Administrator is charged with
installing and maintaining the moderation software (including any ancillary
software like procmail recipes), with making the moderation code publicly
available to all who wish to inspect it, with ownership (either actual or
delegated to a trusted third party) of the group submissions address, and
with communicating about technical problems with Moderators and
participants. The Technical Administrator has no hand-moderation duties,
and is not a voting member of the Board. A new Technical Administrator can
only be selected by an outgoing Technical Administrator, or, if the previous
Technical Administrator has abandoned the group, by a request to the Usenet
Moderators' mailing list.
The current moderation procedures and policies are described in the
Moderation Policy, which is maintained by the Head Moderator. Any changes
to the Moderation Policy are subject to approval by a simple majority vote
of the Moderation Board. The Moderation Policy shall be reviewed for
possible changes, and input for changes to the Policy shall be sought from
the readership of the group annually.
General complaints, dissatisfaction, and grousing about Moderators or the
Moderation Policy can be aired on a public, unmoderated mailing list. That
list is open to all and will be read by at least one member of the Board.
The Moderation Policy, or a URL pointing to it, is posted once a week to
misc.writing.moderated.
END CHARTER.
MODERATOR INFO: misc.writing.moderated
Moderator: "Kelly Madeleine"
Moderator: "John V Ashby"
Moderator: "David M. Harris"
Moderator: "Jen Jensen"
Moderator: "Hound of Cullen"
Administrative contact address: mwm-request@panix.com
Article submission address: mwm@panix.com
END MODERATOR INFO.
MODERATION POLICY:
Moderation Policy for misc.writing.moderated
Introduction
Misc.writing.moderated is moderated, which means that all articles submitted
to the group pass through a review process before being posted. Currently,
moderation is performed primarily by software, though some articles are
forwarded to human moderators for review.
The charter, which defines what topics are appropriate for discussion in
this newsgroup, is posted to misc.writing.moderated once per week.
1. Structure of the Moderation Board
Misc.writing.moderated is moderated by a Moderation Board, which consists of
a Head Moderator and several Associate Moderators. The number of Associate
Moderators will be set by the Board, but the Board will make a good-faith
effort to maintain a membership of at least three Associate Moderators.
Only members of the Moderation Board have the power to approve posts.
The Board may, at its discretion, elect a reasonable number of Backup
Moderators to serve in the case of temporary absence of a Moderator.
The Head Moderator maintains this Moderation Policy.
The Head Moderator shall only cast a vote when any Board vote results in a
tie.
1.1 Board Membership
The Board controls its own membership. It shall admit new members with a
simple majority vote, or remove members by a 2/3 vote. Board members
(excepting the founding Board members) must come from the active posters of
misc.writing.moderated, and volunteers for a vacant Moderatorship should be
solicited from misc.writing.moderated posters by the Board via a post tagged
[ADMIN]. Backup Moderators vote as Associate Moderators when electing Board
members.
New Board members may be elected when any of the following occur:
- Retirement of a Moderator;
- Death of a Moderator;
- Neglect of moderation duties by a Moderator for 30 consecutive days
without prior announcement;
- Expansion of the size of the Board;
- Expulsion of a Moderator.
The Board shall elect a new Head Moderator by a simple majority vote if the
position becomes vacant; the Head Moderator or the Board shall appoint a
Moderator to fill in for the Head Moderator during short periods of absence.
The Head Moderator must be elected from the present membership of the Board.
1.2 Expulsion of a Moderator
The expulsion of a Moderator may be called for by the readership of
misc.writing.moderated, including members of the Board. Valid reasons for
calling for the expulsion of a Moderator include intolerance, unfairness,
negligence, and lack of impartiality. Such a request should be made via
e-mail directly to the Board at mwm-request@panix.com.
On receipt of such a request an article will be posted to the newsgroup
titled "[ADMIN] Call for Removal of " announcing the start
of a discussion period not less than 15 days. This discussion shall be
public and take place only on the associated public mailing list
. Discussion on the newsgroup itself will be
grounds for a poster being placed on the watchlist. During this discussion
all active Moderators should monitor the mailing list.
At the end of the public discussion phase the Moderators shall consider the
views of the readership via the Moderators' mailing list. At the end of
this consideration period, not less than seven days or more than fourteen
days, the Head Moderator shall call for a vote. A 2/3 vote of the Board is
required to remove a Moderator. The Board's decision shall be posted to the
newsgroup in an article titled "[ADMIN] Removal Vote Result of {Moderator's
name}" stating whether the call for removal has been successful or not.
Each Moderator's vote shall be listed. The reader who called for removal
shall also be informed via e-mail of the result.
For purposes of removal, the Head Moderator is treated like any other
Moderator. If the Head Moderator is subject to a recall vote, the Moderator
with the next highest seniority shall temporarily assume the recall duties
of the Head Moderator.
Only one Moderator may be subject to recall at any one time.
The Board reserves the right to summarily dismiss frivolous recalls, to
forestall disruption of the group's functioning by malicious trolls issuing
one call for removal after another.
1.3 The Technical Administrator
As technical expertise is required for continued functioning of the
moderation software, misc.writing.moderated calls upon the skills of a
Technical Administrator. The Technical Administrator is charged with
installing and maintaining the moderation software (including any ancillary
software like procmail recipes), with making the moderation code publicly
available to all who wish to inspect it, with ownership (either actual or
delegated to a trusted third party) of the group submissions address, and
with communicating about technical problems with Moderators and
participants. The Technical Administrator has no hand-moderation duties,
and is not a voting member of the Board. A new Technical Administrator can
only be selected by an outgoing Technical Administrator, or, if the previous
Technical Administrator has abandoned the group, by a request to the Usenet
Moderators' mailing list at .
1.4 Pathological Cases
Since most of this Moderation Policy hinges on there being at least two
Associate Moderators and a Head Moderator, we address the following
pathological cases:
a. The case where there is only one Associate Moderator and a Head
Moderator: In this case, the Head Moderator votes as a regular Board
member. As Board votes may result in a tie in this situation, ties shall be
decided as follows: When voting on a proposed change in Moderation Policy,
the proposed change will be rejected. When voting to elect a new Moderator,
the Moderator will be elected. When voting to remove a Moderator, the
Moderator will not be removed.
b. The case where there is only one Moderator: In this case, numerous
segments of this Moderation Policy become inoperable. The lone Moderator
should ensure that the group continues to function in as normal a manner as
possible while attempting to re-staff the Board.
c. The case where there are no Moderators: In this case, prior to leaving
his or her moderation duties, the final outgoing Moderator should ensure that
the following occur:
(1.) The Watch List should be emptied.
(2.) The moderation software should be set to pass all posts that would
otherwise require hand-moderation.
If the final outgoing Moderator fails in those tasks, the Technical
Administrator should see to them.
Posters to misc.writing.moderated are then charged with selecting new
Moderators, possibly with the help of the Technical Administrator.
2. Moderation Process
All articles to the group may be processed through moderation software which
takes one of the following actions on each article, in order of technical
precedence:
- Reject it outright if it meets certain criteria (see 6. Current Grounds
for Auto-Rejection);
- Forward it to a Board member if it meets certain other criteria (see 7.
Current Grounds for Human Moderation); or
- Post it immediately.
As misc.writing.moderated is moderated strictly by content, the author's
identity should not be considered when determining if an article meets the
requirements of the group's charter. A Moderator may place certain
individuals or sites that repeatedly post off-charter material on a "Watch
List," which will cause their articles to be forwarded to a human Moderator
for review (see 10. The Watch List). A Moderator may also declare certain
off-charter discussion threads to be "closed," so that no more articles in
that thread are to be posted. There is no avenue of appeal for the closure
of a thread.
Any Moderator unable to judge an article in a fair and unbiased way should
pass that article to the next Moderator in the queue.
An article approved for posting by a human Moderator may not be modified,
except that an "approved" header must be inserted, and a generic header or
footer may be appended.
Rejected articles are, if possible, be returned to their sender with a note
of explanation. In cases of extreme abuse, the Technical Administrator may
configure the moderation software to automatically discard all postings from
a sender without attempting to return them (see 6.1 Extreme Abuse).
Rejected articles may be appealed to an appeals address. The appeals
address appears in all rejection notices.
If an article is posted immediately, the moderation software must insert an
"approved" header, and may append a generic footer.
See also section 8, Current Grounds for Rejection by Human Moderators, and
section 11, Rejection and Appeals.
3. Retromoderation
An article is normally subject to rejection only when it is submitted.
Canceling an article after it has been posted ("retromoderation") will not
be used for general content control. Cancellations are permitted only
under the following special circumstances:
- When performed or requested by the original poster or by the poster's
Internet Service Provider;
- When performed by the Technical Administrator or a Moderator to cancel
articles with forged approvals;
- When performed by reputable third-party cancelers (as determined by the
Technical Administrator), to cancel articles that are widely considered to
be undesirable in most of Usenet, e.g. binaries and excessively multiposted
articles ("spam").
4. New Users / Approved Users
The moderation software maintains a list of "approved" e-mail addresses,
articles from which are posted by the software without human moderation.
When a poster not on the approved list submits an article, the moderation
software will:
- Email the poster a welcome message that summarizes the charter of
misc.writing.moderated and gives a certain keyword.
- If the article's subject contains the keyword, post the article
immediately and add the poster to the "approved" list.
- If the article's subject does not contain the keyword, filter the article
out and return it, with a message explaining a simple way to add the
keyword and repost the article.
- Strip all occurrences of the keyword from posted article subjects.
The list of email addresses is to be used only for approving posts to
misc.writing.moderated. It must not be sold, given away, or used as a
mailing list. It starts empty, and is added to only as above. New posters
are advised that their address has been added. List entries may be
aged out after a term determined by the space available on the moderating
host, to be not less than one year. Posters may request removal of their
address from the "approved" list if they no longer wish to post to the
group, or have changed accounts. While posting with "munged" addresses is
not encouraged, posters using such addresses can have themselves added to
the "approved" list by following the instructions in the FAQ (since the
moderation software will not be able to send any instructions to a munged
address, onus is on the poster to seek
out the instructions pre-posting).
The keyword and its use shall always be clearly explained in the group's FAQ
and welcome message. The FAQ is made available as a frequently posted
article, and also via an autoreplier at the moderating host. The welcome
message is also available by
autoreplier.
The keyword may be changed at the discretion of the Board. For 15 days
after a new keyword goes into effect, both the old and the new keyword are
valid. They need not be in any particular lexicon, but must be less than 10
letters long, not use case meaningfully, be reasonably easy to spell and
remember, and not be very likely to occur normally in the subject of a post.
An "approved" user who repeatedly posts off-charter material may be placed
on the Watch List. See Section 10.
5. Statement of Respect
Misc.writing.moderated is a newsgroup for writers. The Moderators will
consider all posters to be colleagues or peers, and will strive to treat all
posters with unfailing courtesy and respect. Additionally, as writers, we
should be bound to respect the words of others. Intolerance, unfairness,
negligence, or lack of impartiality by a Moderator toward a poster are
grounds for calling for that Moderator's removal from the Board (see 1.2
Expulsion of a Moderator).
6. Current Grounds for Auto-Rejection
The moderation software is currently returning the following kinds of
articles to their senders, without posting them. All returned articles must
have generic text appended or prepended containing a pointer to the group's
FAQ, and the appeals process:
- Crossposted articles, except: RFDs, CFVs, and related administrative
postings (as approved by the moderators of news.announce.newgroups) with
followups set to news.groups and/or misc.writing.moderated, articles in
response to such postings if only crossposted between news.groups and
misc.writing.moderated, and FAQs and similar informational postings (as
approved by the moderators of news.answers).
- Binaries. (Note that this excepts cryptographic authentication such as
PGP.)
- Articles with an empty or missing Subject header.
- Articles submitted via email with a missing Newsgroups header.
6.1 Extreme Abuse
While the Moderators will make every attempt to work through moderation
issues with individual posters, it is important that the Moderators have a
mechanism to defend the functioning of the newsgroup. To this end, the
Moderators are empowered to configure software to auto-reject all articles
>from any poster who is perceived as attacking the functioning of the group.
This is an extreme step, and should only be taken under the following
exceptional circumstances:
- When there is clear evidence that a spew, flood, mailbombing or other such
attack is occurring. In this case, action should be taken as quickly as
possible to eliminate the threat to the group.
- When a poster has forge-cancelled on-charter posts without permission. In
this case, action should be taken as quickly as possible to eliminate the
threat to the group, and improperly cancelled posts will be reposted.
- When a poster has shown oft-repeated and exceptionally stubborn
unwillingness to abide by the charter of the newsgroup. Such a poster can
only be relegated to auto-reject status by a unanimous vote of the Board.
Posts auto-rejected for extreme abuse are returned to their sender.
A poster can be removed from the auto-reject list by a majority vote of the
Board after a minimum of three months.
7. Current Grounds for Human Moderation
The moderation software is currently forwarding the following types of
articles to human Moderators for review. Since most Moderators actually
have lives outside of Usenet, there may be a delay of 24 hours or more
before such articles are either posted
or returned to their senders.
- Articles from certain addresses that have posted one or more off-charter
articles in the past (see 10. The Watch List).
8. Current Grounds for Rejection by Human Moderators
Moderators should bear in mind that the purpose of moderation is to maintain
focussed discussion in an atmosphere of mutual respect. When approving an
article, therefore, a Moderator must determine how closely the article
adheres to the charter of misc.writing.moderated. The criterion that should
be applied uniformly to all articles is: Would a reasonable person agree
that this article conforms substantially to the charter for the newsgroup?
Grudges, personal dislikes, and any other forms of disagreement that a
Moderator might have with a newsgroup participant are specifically not to be
used to decide the approval status of a post. Each article must be judged
on its own, and prior posting history is not to be brought to bear in the
decision.
An article rejected by a human Moderator is returned (subject to the
limitations in 9. Discarded Articles and 6.1 Extreme Abuse) with a footer or
header detailing the specific reason(s) for rejection, and the name of the
Moderator responsible for rejecting the post.
9. Discarded Articles
There are certain circumstances under which the moderation software (or a
human Moderator) may discard an article without returning it to its sender.
The following types of articles may currently be discarded without
attempting to return them to their sender:
- Articles with faked addresses (for which returns would simply "bounce", or
worse, be delivered to innocent people whose addresses happen to match a
faked address), in cases where there are several rejections per day and in
which there is a pattern that establishes a single real source for the
rejected articles.
- Articles that appear to be attacking the functioning of the group (see 6.1
Extreme Abuse).
10. The Watch List
The Watch List is a list of e-mail addresses, postings from which are
automatically forwarded to a member of the Moderation Board for review.
An address that has been a source of one or more off-charter articles may be
placed on the Watch List by any Moderator, who must also notify the rest of
the Board, and attempt to notify the person at that address.
At the discretion of the Moderator who decides to place an address on the
Watch List, one of the following options may be used for attempting to
notify the poster:
- The person may be given a private warning that further off-charter
postings will place his/her address on the Watch List. This should be the
normal response.
- The address may be placed on the Watch List immediately, and the person
notified of this action privately and without delay.
An address will be removed from the Watch List by a majority vote of the
Moderation Board, either when the person at that address has posted
appropriately to the newsgroup for a period of at least seven full calendar
days, or when no posts from that address have been received for a period of
at least six months.
11. Rejection and Appeals
The moderation software tries to return any rejected article to the sender
via email, subject to the limitations in section 9. Discarded Articles.
The email shall include the reason for the rejection, an address where the
rejection can be appealed, and a pointer to the FAQ. The current appeals
address is: .
Some rejection messages "bounce" because of invalid e-mail addresses. A
Moderator will examine these bounces and make a good-faith effort to fix bad
addresses and re-send such rejection notices.
Articles whose rejections are appealed will be considered by all members of
the Board. If any member of the Board, including the Head Moderator, finds
that the article conforms substantially to the charter, then the article
will be posted. If there are fewer than three Associate Moderators, then
Backup Moderators will also consider the appeal.
There is no further avenue of appeal for rejected articles.
12. Adjunct Venues
All participants in misc.writing.moderated are requested to refrain from
taking their moderation grievances to other newsgroups. Appeals,
complaints, and general dissatisfaction with the policies or behaviors of
the Moderators or those moderated should be discussed through channels
appropriate to misc.writing.moderated, to wit:
- Grievances or questions can be sent directly to the Moderation Board at
.
- General complaints, dissatisfaction, and grousing about Moderators or the
Moderation Policy can be aired on the public, unmoderated mailing list
. That list is open to all and is read by at
least one member of the Board at all times.
13. Changes to This Policy
The Moderation Policy shall be reviewed for possible changes, and input for
changes to the Policy shall be sought from the readership of the group
annually. Changes to the Moderation Policy may be made by a simple majority
vote of the Board. Any proposed changes should be discussed via the
associated mailing list .
14. Moderator Contacts
Send mail related to the moderation of the group to .
The Moderation Board in charge of moderation for misc.writing.moderated is
made up of:
Head Moderator:
Kelly Madeleine
Associate Moderators:
John V Ashby
David M. Harris
Jen Jensen
Hound of Cullen
Backup Moderators:
Carol Flynt
Gerald Clough
Technical Administrator:
piranha
END MODERATION POLICY.
DISTRIBUTION:
Pointers directing readers to this CFV will be posted in these groups:
alt.fiction.original
misc.writing.screenplays
rec.arts.books
rec.arts.mystery
rec.arts.poems
misc.writing.moderated Final Voter list
Voted YES
===============================================================================
Kwrected#bigpond.com.au Andrew Csonka
toivo#ucs.uwa.edu.au Toivo Pedaste
thompson#chariot.net.au Paul Thompson
chris#stallion.oz.au Christopher Biggs
metatron#escape.ca Sylvia Li
feistywriter#netcom.ca JL Senatore
trevort#vianet.on.ca Trevor Tymchuk
randywatt#4autos.com Randall Watt
simblet#acmecity.com Carla Simblet
rallen#plaza.ds.adp.com Rob Allen
kemnunn#americamail.com Kem Nunn
AnWinEsp#aol.com Anne Winthrop
Coinlord#aol.com
Cynth91183#aol.com Cynthia Damiano
DenaJo#aol.com
Gizmophreax#aol.com Jason Dimmelstein
MWyck0828#aol.com Malia McCawley Wyckoff
WoofWoofWoofWoof#aol.com Gina Andresen
vitavitavegamin#axoskate.com Ted Borkowski
enigma#BayView.COM Holly L. Ward
hermit#BayView.COM William R. Ward
damien#bernafamily.com Eric Damien Berna
cowboystud#bigger.com Joseph D. Smith
mschiffer#birdmail.com Mike Schiffer
brookter#btinternet.com David Bertenshaw
ichard#cadence.com Ian Chard
stef#cat-and-dragon.com Stef Maruch
carol#cflynt.com Carol A. Flynt
clif#cflynt.com Clif Flynt
jdudley#chequemail.com Jane Dudley
72027.3605#compuserve.com
paulh#computerbits.com Paul Harwood
jzh#cyberscience.com Jon Huxtable
hollyholly#dotcool.com Holly Pulaski
howdyhowdy#dotcool.com Rick Hammond
kittybobitty#dotcool.com Katherine Bittman
mcclenon#erols.com Bob McClenon
gae#esworthy.com George Alan Esworthy
pbowne#execpc.com Patricia S. Bowne
biow#ezmort.com Christopher Biow
david#farrar.com David Farrar
dave#frackit.com Dave Ratcliffe
starswirler#geocities.com Paine Ellsworth
dougob55#go.com D. David Oberthroogd
dilickjm#home.com John Dilick
kmadeleine#home.com Kelly Madeleine
Carterj98#HOTMAIL.COM Carter Jefferson
gethorny1#hotmail.com Andy Cohen
lostpuppy3#hotmail.com Bradley Pitt
shrao#hotmail.com Shrisha Rao
toejam_78#hotmail.com Toejammn Mann
mulveyk#iname.com Katy Mulvey
pziselberger#iname.com Hound of Cullen
dietz#interaccess.com Paul F. Dietz
whytcrow#io.com Jennifer Brinn
zephyn#io.com Keith E. Peyton
lavina#islandnet.com Lavina Galbraith
iceberg#iw3p.com William Thomas Quick
chris#kzim.com Christopher Robin Zimmerman
mdoherty#mac.com Miche Doherty
kindall#manual.com Jerry Kindall
bglake#mindspring.com Barbara Grace Lake
chyla#mindspring.com Cindy Hyland
olav#viking.mv.com Olav Nieuwejaar
the_guy_at_node3#my-deja.com Burt Kendall
aahz#netcom.com Aahz
fi#oceanstar.com Fiona Webster
sleepy#os.com Alexander Pennace
gaillard#panix.com Ed Gaillard
tindall#panix.com Bruce Tindall
jensen#peavine.com Jennifer Jensen
buff#pobox.com William Denton
piranha#pobox.com piranha
tybalt#prime-online.com Craig Burley
gloriamralak#purpleturtle.com Gloria Mralak
rootbeer#redcat.com Tom Phoenix
rjuliano#cfl.rr.com Bob Juliano
serenebabe#serenebabe.com Heather Santmire
kurtullman#sprintmail.com Kurt Ullman
nsmith#micro.ti.com Neal Smith
entropy#timestreamer.com anna halbert
davidsen#tmr.com Bill Davidsen
rickychang#torchmail.com Ricky Chang
self#towse.com Sal Towse
tyrichards#truckracers.com Tyrone Richards
dsgood#visi.com Dan Goodman
bjf#wavefront.com Beth Friedman
brad#whidbey.com Bradley E. Robertson
davidhoag#workmail.com David Hoag
kmeyer360#yahoo.com Kathie Meyer
stonebugdotnet#yahoo.com Scott Elyard
jase.innez#yeehaa.com Jase Innez
torex#kholdan.in-berlin.de tobias erle
naddy#mips.inka.de Christian Weisgerber
bouvin#daimi.au.dk Niels Olof Bouvin
jthomas#aug.edu Jenna Thomas-McKie
hough#gps.caltech.edu Susan Hough
pm39#andrew.cmu.edu P Mazaitis
dsr#mail.lns.cornell.edu Daniel S. Riley
harvey#iupui.edu James Harvey
cmclaugh#mcw.edu Chris McLaughlin
bmoses#stanford.edu Brooks Moses
rufinus#mbe.ece.wisc.edu J Rufinus
kwelch#facstaff.wisc.edu Kevin Welch
kristian.liimatainen#helsinki.fi Lauri Liimatainen
ts#UWasa.Fi Timo Salmi
llehmann#club-internet.fr Laurent Lehmann
porter.clark#msfc.nasa.gov J. Porter Clark
popstar#mail.lv
cemanuel#accs.net Curt Emanuel
doc#america.net Rob Wynne
annabanana#annabanana.net Anna Banana
joyseymour#worldnet.att.net Joyleen E. Seymour
willowbrookemill#worldnet.att.net Genna Reeney
dfdoyle#bellsouth.net Donna F. Doyle
baird#gate.net Baird Stafford
Aspsusa#gmx.net Antonia Palmén
jmh#gmx.net Jan Haar
tlhise#inav.net Tom Hise
alexdw#locl.net Alex LaHurreau
aslan#magicforest.net Mark Holtz
ErinBarrett#pacbell.net Erin Barrett
mingo#pacbell.net Jack Mingo
greyhosky#physicist.net Barbara "Babs" Greyhosky
wakelyn#pinn.net N. T. Wakelyn
Pastorio#rica.net Bob Pastorio (pastorio#rica.net)
evert#royal.net Evert Meulie esq
laurel#sff.net Laurel Amberdine
b.nachison#snet.net Beth Nachison
dfreeman#sonic.net Dan Freeman
clough#texas.net Gerald Clough clough#texas.net
critic#these-survive.net Joe Bernstein
tclarke#tiac.net Timothy Clarke
algernonbeckwith#usa.net Algernon Beckwith
doctorsmut#usa.net Jerry Feinberg
judithrascoe#usa.net Judith Rascoe
kenyonpyle#usa.net Kenyon Pyle
misspancake#usa.net Mary Marciniak
bdonovan#wightman.net Willondon Donovan
terje27#online.no Terje=20
John_David_Galt#acm.org John David Galt
mooring#acm.org Ed Mooring
chessler#capaccess.org David Chessler
clore#columbia-center.org Dan Clore
berniex#efn.org Bernard Rogge
goddess#peak.org Marg Petersen
djb#v2000.scream.org Dan Birchall
D.W.H.McNair#durham.ac.uk Duncan
jva#inf.rl.ac.uk John V Ashby
jibberwigs#020.co.uk Alan Bennett
Jo#bluejo.demon.co.uk Jo Walton
chriseb#ukshells.co.uk Chris Ebenezer
steve#spelbind.demon.co.uk Steve Pritchard
talacko#yarn.demon.co.uk Paul Talacko
ian#lastime.freeserve.co.uk Ian Neeson
Voted NO
===============================================================================
ing.blueyes#sympatico.ca ingrid gadsden
AutmDragon#aol.com Kaichi Satake
LAWunder#aol.com Linda Wunderlich
kimdv#best.com Kim DeVaughn
stainles#bga.com Dwight Brown
dchigley#bigfoot.com D. C. Higley
eae#bigfoot.com Eric=20
momblanche#bigfoot.com Blanche Nonken
reverie#clarityconnect.com Smokey
SSipes#comsoltx.com Sonya M. Sipes
tjmc#enteract.com tjmc
smeghead#erols.com Alex Jay Berman
fouts#fogey.com Martin Fouts
dwyman#home.com Doug Wyman
stan_kid#hotmail.com Stan Kid
tamara_bradley#hotmail.com Tamara Bradley
ajcarol#mindspring.com Carol Schmidt
blnadri#mindspring.com B.L. Nadri
gprrspw#mindspring.com G.P. Ryan
illbegood#mindspring.com Lily
jmartalo#mindspring.com John Martalo
rainfield#mindspring.com Andy Elfway
r5555c#email.sps.mot.com Alan Chapman
tgm#netcom.com Thomas G. McWilliams
Laura#nitelinks.com Laura Higley
john1#world.std.com john1#world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
julian#tele.com Julian Macassey
Abhay.Natu#wcom.com Abhay Natu
silly#well.com Thomas Armagost
jkent#writelinks.com Janet Kent
Ekkehard.Uthke#gmx.de Ekkehard Uthke
Hugh_Watkins#net.dialog.dk Hugh Watkins
rick#bcm.tmc.edu Richard H. Miller
bblair#aa.net Bruce Blair
arjanz#worldnet.att.net Arleen Janz
aobensam#concentric.net Arlene Bensam
deck#gate.net Deck Deckert
kneecap#netnet.net Neal Cappel
mmontcha#OregonVOS.net Matthew Montchalin
patm7#prodigy.net Pat Marcello
billo#Radix.Net William R. Oliver
anghara#ihug.co.nz Alma Hromic
katepc#ihug.co.nz Kate Parker-Corney
ari.cword#mbox304.swipnet.se Ari Nordström
jon#thomson2273.freeserve.co.uk Jon Thomson
Abstained
===============================================================================
ahope#skynet.be Alan Hope
yan#storm.ca Yves Bellefeuille
sforsell#aol.com Scott Forsell
wcgreen#cris.com Wendy Chatley Green
moira_d#iname.com moira d
wiz#lart.com Mike Craig
glynne#mindspring.com Glynne Gilmore
kathy#newsreaders.com Kathy I. Morgan
rra#stanford.edu Russ Allbery
bard#digital-marketplace.net Bard
r.vanette#pink.nl Robert-Jan van Ette
Invalid ballots
===============================================================================
No invalid votes
To restore the email addresses above, pipe the ack list through the
following command:
sed -e 's/#/@/g'
--
Voting question & problems: Dave Cornejo
Voting address: vote@dogwood.com
|